๐๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ง๐๐ซ...67% ๐จ๐ ๐2๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฒ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐๐ซ ๐ง๐จ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ ๐๐ญ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ.
๐๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ข...๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ฌ 7.6% ๐จ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐.
Buyers need us less, and most of our sellers arenโt the reason anyone buys.
A year ago I gave a keynote in Sydney called Itโs the End of the World as We Know It (And I Feel Fine). Iโve gone back through it to see what survived the year.
What I got wrong was the speed.
AI has handed enablement the first real capacity windfall it has ever had. Mindtickle asked 30 enablement leaders where that time went. I counted every answer.
Two said diagnosis. Twenty-eight said more coaching, more content, more role plays.
And hereโs what sits underneath that spread. Nothing in the Clari data says capability is the problem. It could be territory design. Lead routing. Product fit by segment. Frontline management. A comp plan quietly paying better on the deals you say you donโt want.
Six candidates, six different fixes, and only one of them lands on enablementโs desk.
The methods for telling them apart have been in print since 1970. Almost nobody in this profession was ever taught them.
Iโve written it up two ways. A short version, and a fully referenced long version with the Clari, Gartner and Mindtickle data, Gilbertโs model, and the six-step diagnostic I actually use.
Both below.
Itโs the end of the worldโฆrevisited
Next
Next